Why Is It That Global Warming Scientists Admit That They Have No Idea of the Complexity of Global Temperature?
Fudging and changing data that creates the fantasy of man made global weather changes does nothing worthwhile. There is no model that man has created that can predict or foretell global changes. The fact that mankind today has -0% to do with global warming is beside the point. What we need to worry about is global ice age that always follows these slight warming periods.
Al Gore created the internet, global warming and now this man is using this nonsense for political purposes and raising the cost of living life on this planet.
All those graphs are composites stitched together to create an Alice in Wonderland fantasy and those scientists who are afraid of losing their funding would agree that the Martians are creating earth climate changes if that is what men like Gore which to prove.
It is difficult responding to brain washed media driven information or Al Gore, scientist extraordianre.
Many reputable scientists not wishing to lie to keep their jobs or oil industry propagandists give facts as they know them as compared to the latest political theories of gas bubbles in ice or carbon/CO2 foot tracks in global temperature.
Historical data that has not been contaminated with absurdities proves that volcanoes and the tilting of the earth on its axis around the sun along with sun flares and water vapor from the sea are greater influences on temperature changes on any part of the earth than man since the creation of CO2 or carbon pollution in the last hundred or so years.
If all you can do is insult me just because I am using actual historical data measured as real temperatures in these years proves that you have no knowledge of planet earth than Al Gore or Dick Van Dyke.
Eliminate name calling as your answers to earth’s danger of being struck by a comet or meteor
Bob you truly are a funny dude.
You make such absolute statements about MAN-MADE global warming..
You said: “The graphs below are well respected science. They show that the temperature is going up and that man is mostly to blame.”
Just how respected those scientists who create graphs upon graphs and absolute statements relating to their knowledge of earth warming events.
Just face it my boy, the argument between pro and con reputable scientists continues on with no one of knowledge having the vaguest idea of the tremendous variables that can neither be made into any real or fictionalized graphs that one iota of meaning.
I say that all mankind should eliminate CO2 from the face of the earth so that plants and the ocean flora will no longer be able to produce oxygen. Heck, we wouldn’t have to worry at all if all the inhabitants of the earth should die off.
Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get. Mark Twain
Harbourbug
You are quite correct in that there is no evidence that global warming is a problem or that man caused it with the Al Gore carbon print.
It is a nice thought to clean up the earth but in fact, science has been able to demonstrate that this earth has built in mechanisms for cleansing the earth of excess CO2 and all the other pollutants thrown out by volcanoes and everything else that results from natures own pollution.
Science excepts the fact that mankind can do little or nothing to cleanse the biosphere for that is part of the nature’s unbelievable fine tunning which has allowed and continues to permit life forms t exist on this earth.
January 4th, 2009 at 5:40 am
You sure know a lot about science, they should hire you,
did you buy your PhD on the internet
January 6th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Okay… Time for your medicine. Then back to a nice warm bed.
The big bad world won’t harm you anymore my dear.
January 6th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
they either actually don’t know or are hiding facts or twisting facts to keep their endowments and grants
January 8th, 2009 at 9:18 am
So where did you receive your graduate degrees in climatology? Oh, you don’t have one? Great. Nice evidence as well, I like how you have no supporting evidence for your claims.
Look, scientists do not falsify their observations for the most part and those who do are rooted out by peer review. Nearly no scientist claims to know the entire complexity of global climates and how recent warming will affect them because that claim would be false. Scientists observe that the planet is warming up and they also acknowledge that it is definitely a natural process. However, there is also evidence that we are playing somewhat of a role in that natural process and we are trying to discover the consequences thereof.
Al Gore does not speak on behave of scientists.
January 11th, 2009 at 4:58 am
If global warming were a problem we could easily solve the problem by reflecting more of the suns rays back into space. This is the inverse of a plan to spray coal dust on the plains a few years ago to stop the ice age back in the 70’s. I have heard no lefty suggest this cure. This tells me that Global warming is not the real issue. Also look at the fact that people like Algore use more power than you, I and most of the people on this block put together.
January 13th, 2009 at 3:21 am
Forget about Al Gore. He has nothing to do with global warming science. What he does is completely irrelevant to the truth of global warming.
The graphs below are well respected science. They show that the temperature is going up and that man is mostly to blame.
Now tell us why people should believe the philosophical rants of global warming deniers is more credible than the data, these scientists:
and the Source below?
EDIT: “Just how respected those scientists who create graphs upon graphs and absolute statements relating to their knowledge of earth warming events.”
Very well respected. Proof:
“The fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists. I challenge you, if you think there is some un-reported division, show me the hundreds of abstracts that support your view – you won’t be able to. You can argue whether the consensus is correct, or what it really implies, but you can’t credibly argue it doesn’t exist.”
Dr. James Baker – NOAA
January 13th, 2009 at 11:13 am
Okay…..the big answer here is that scientists are not fudging or even trying to fudge their data. The problem is they just dont have any. Over the millions and millions of years this earth has been here, we barely have 100 years worth of decent records and only about 20 years of anybody even being concerned about this problem with enough science to study it. There are no reliable data points to refer to, rings in trees, frozen mammoths, crinoid stems on Arizona mountains, vegetation matter in frost laden areas where vegetation could not exist. It is all confusing and very misleading, but there is no solid data to say what kind of trend or cycle our lovely planet Earth is going through or how many times it has already done it. I do not belive in the global warming theory because there is absolutely no long term data to substantiate it. However, I do believe “Clean Earth…Good Earth!” and we should all do what we can to keep it as clean as possible. No doubt about that!!!